For this exercise I was to go out and photograph my local environment in
two ways.
I chose to photograph the city of Lincoln, where I live. I needed to do
the work on a compact camera without using a zoom. I needed to try to think of
the viewer looking at my work in 100 years time. The images should be self
explanatory - as in what's happening. I was to select 12 images to show the
place 'warts and all'.
I need to write 250 words reviewing my images to establish to what
extent I have managed to show the 'truth' about your town or area.
I then re-visit the same location with my DSLR and this time, apply a
craft approach to the scene. Producing a set of images that shows the area at
it's best or most intriguing. This second set of images is to be reviewed to
consider the role of the social documentary photographer. Asking is it possible
to create a false impression? When we look at the work of documentary
photographers do we believe what we see? Is integrity therefore an issue for
the social documentary photographer?
The first set of photo's I took were with a compact camera, two sets for
the first part of the exercise are taken, firstly with a compact, secondly with
an iphone. The reason for taking two sets had nothing to do with the choice of
equipment. Once I compared the photo's I quickly noticed a stark contrast with
the two sets and upon reading the brief again, I released I'd read it wrong and
although uphill and downhill Lincoln are the same city, they are so very
different I thought it too misleading for this exercise, even though the
subject explores the idea of photographers misleading using different
techniques, equipment etc I felt the photo's should be taken in the same area
of the city, so I repeated the set taken with the compact and repeated the set which
were also taken with an iphone.
The set taken with an iphone, reflect similar scenes taken in the DSLR
set in order to achieve a good comparison, The photos are taken in the
cathedral quarter of the uphill area of the city, an area which attracts many
thousands of visitors each year.
Part - taken with compact:






Part one - taken with iphone:
| Half way up steep hill is an area that opens up a little. This image has an areas I would have addressed in Lightroom |
| This image of the Crooked House, Michaelgate also takes in the Cathedral in the back ground. |
| Further up steep hill, there are marble cobbles which form lines across the frame that are quite difficult to see in this image taken with the iphone |
| Another popular scene of the leaning lamp post, of which there are a few in this area, its's also half way up steep hill where out of puff visitors often stop for a rest |
| Looking from the Straits to Steep Hill |
| Along the Straits you will find the Jews House and Jews Court, 12th century Synagogue, the current three-storey building seems dates from the 17th or 18th century. |
| This is a lovely corner bric a brac shop, often has a dog sitting outside, which adds to the image. The high dynamic range of this image would really need attention in Lightroom |
Review of first set of images:
From a technical perspective, the images once loaded onto my blog without any post processing, are smaller than the second set, this was due to the images being taken on my iphone, which are also take with a fixed focal length of 35mm. Almost all of the images showed a high dynamic range and would have benefitted from post processing to correct the exposure. The focus of the images was also an issue, with many of the images appearing to have no point of focus giving a ‘point and shoot’ feel, which is primarily what they were. The sight of scaffolding in one of the images doesn’t make for an attractive view. Overall, there seemed to be a lack of detail with all the images.
Have I shown the truth about the area? I suppose that depends on which side of the city you look at, the initial set I took with the compact show suggestions of depravation, road works and rubbish bins, which whilst present in most city’s, I didn’t feel it gave a true representation, the fair approach probably being a mixture of the two. The second set of images for the first part of this exercise show the pleasant views but also don’t do the area justice at all as there is no detail and the exposure does the images no favours. When looking at the first set of images, it could be easily established that the viewer is looking at a set of images from a completely different place as there are no similarities at all. (words = 260)
![]() |
| Leigh-Pemberton house - large timber framed merchant's house of 1543 |
![]() |
| The view of the castle entrance from the Cathedral squrare |
![]() |
| Looking from the top of Steep Hill, I took this image with the cobbled curb stones forming a curved line that takes the eye to Leigh-Pemberton House, just visible at the top right of the frame |
![]() |
| The Crooked house again, the buildings and the Cathedral in the background enhance the image and are more noticeable as they are in focus. |
![]() |
| View across Michael gate on the way up Steep Hill, with the Cathedral spires in the background. |
![]() |
| View up Steep Hill with the scaffolding cropped out, the object of the image now becomes the people starting their climb up the hill. |
![]() |
| Jews House and Jews court, without people in the image, makes the image appear timeless |
![]() |
| The Straits |
![]() |
| The Guildhall and Stonebow, early 16th century building which forms an archway over high street. |
![]() |
| The Brayford Waterfront, an area of regeneration over the last 20 years which is now a vibrant and exciting area of Lincoln here you will find stylish restaurants and internationally renowned hotels. |
All of the photo's in the second set have been post processed the same
in order to produce a set of images that look like they've been intentionally
produced in that way. I used Lightroom 5 to apply changes to exposure where
needed, contrast, and to add a defined and 'gritty' affect I used the clarity
slider. This exercised considered photo’s in 100 years time, which led me to
review images of the same area I took my photo’s to get some direction. Many of
the images had been replicated from the original black and white images and
given a slight tinge of colour, an effect I remember from photo’s in my
parent’s house. I wanted to give my images that ‘almost black and white’
effect, which in retrospect took too much colour out of the images, so I
increased the colour a little more to a level I was happy with and which I felt
shows the area at it’s best.
The exercise asks to consider the role of the social documentary
photographer, asking is it possible to create a false impression. I would
say this is certainly true, when looking at the same scene with a photo from
set one and two, they could be mistaken as being a different place altogether,
not only that, as Graham Clarke states ‘Far from being a witness, it is often a
director of the way events are seen’1, I take from this that the
photographer can direct a photo, not only the subject and surroundings but also
the equipment used and post processing puts the photographer in the role of
director, the image can be a record of the time or can be loaded with emotional
charges such as surroundings and symbolism.
When looking at early documentary photography, I mainly believe
what I see as I naturally assume they didn't have the same methods
available that we have now and the images are considered an accurate record of
what once was. 'But in many contexts the notion of a literal and objective
record of 'history' is a limited illusion. It ignores the entire cultural and
social background against which the image was taken, just as it renders the
photographer as a neutral, passive, and invisible recorder of the scene'2 I have become aware of
this in the images I've taken for this exercise, the first set were of the
'downhill' and not so nice area of the town, and replaced them with two sets of
images from the 'uphill' side of town, the first set of images are a true
record 'warts & all' of the heart of the city, maybe where nothing is
hidden as the tourists don't often stray that far across the city, I'm certain
that all cities have their 'sides' of town which are preferable to visit. Is
integrity therefore an issue for the social documentary photographer? I suppose
it depends on what it is you are trying to achieve, if you simply wish to take
a record of an area of town, then choosing the most pleasing to look at images
would be acceptable, but if you were recording social documentary then a true
picture of the 'warts & all' would be a more accurate approach. (words =
540)
1 - Clarke, G. (1997) the photograph: A
visual and cultural history. Oxford University Press. pp 150
2- Clarke, G. (1997) the
photograph: A visual and cultural history. Oxford University Press. pp 146

















